Bonnaroo’s Musical Evolution

Over the past nine years, Bonnaroo has notably evolved from a jam band fest to an all encompassing music experience.  Was it difficult for Bonnaroo to stray from its jammy roots, or was it a prudent business decision to move in the new direction?  MTT has been to the past four Bonnaroos in a row, and we’ve certainly witnessed firsthand the progression that the festival has made.

Personally, I embrace the changes in band bookings.  Admittedly, I’m not the largest jam band fan in the world (I can only take so much noodling!), so the evolution in booking has been welcomed in my book.  With the noticeable increase in attendees this year, many others must also embrace the changes.  However, in the past few years, we’ve spoken to many jam band purists who feel that Bonnaroo has “sold out” when they turned their back on keeping it jam-centric.

Stagnation of music on a huge festival level is a killer.  I like Widespread Panic, but just how many times can they close a festival?  Phish closing Bonnaroo out in 09 was excellent booking.  They may have played two nights, but their lasting energy helped the burnt out Bonnaroonians to power through the last night.  This past year, Dave Matthews Band closed it out on Sunday night.  Talk about a college kid magnet…  Bonnaroo has successfully avoided musical stagnation by smart and diverse booking.

From The Dead, to Phish, to Panic, then to Jay-Z.  Is this a strong progression?  I feel  that it is.  Actually, I feel as though Mr. Carter’s (Jay-Z) performance at Bonnaroo was one of the best performances (visually and sonically) that I’d ever seen over the years at the festival.

People may argue that 2010 was the least strong headlining roster yet, but how can one ignore the very strong number of supporting acts on the bill!  The dilemma for most people is whether a festival should have amazing headliners, and the rest would just fall into place, or if the fest should have many good undercard bands.  What are your thoughts on the situation?